I wasn't sure where to commence my AI journey. What I am certain of, is the need to test the waters and what better way than to dive in and start swimming?
Right now, I am less worried about Image and Video (Multimodality) than day to day functionality. So I immediately ruled out Dall-e, Adobe Firefly, Luma, HeyGen et al.
The core models I considered were:
I also did some asking around.
I felt women challenged the models both functionally and 'personally', (to include incorporating opinions and thoughts. I felt men challenged the models in more of a this <problem>, then <solution>. It does make me wonder about gender and confirmation bias - a balance I hope AI brings rather than polarises.
I am also part of the Google open source family. So I was a little bias to Gemini. On a more general query Gemini advised me that "Quantitative Risk Management by McNeil, Frey, and Embrechts" underpins my methodology. This is a real book - but I must confess I have not read it. I also doubt that I have as many inherent insights as the 3 authors (however I have taken the hint to add it to my reading list!)
So, the answer for me, for now, is Claude.
Hello Claude - Let's get at it!
I felt women challenged the models both functionally and 'personally', (to include incorporating opinions and thoughts. I felt men challenged the models in more of a this <problem>, then <solution>. It does make me wonder about gender and confirmation bias - a balance I hope AI brings rather than polarises.
I am also part of the Google open source family. So I was a little bias to Gemini. On a more general query Gemini advised me that "Quantitative Risk Management by McNeil, Frey, and Embrechts" underpins my methodology. This is a real book - but I must confess I have not read it. I also doubt that I have as many inherent insights as the 3 authors (however I have taken the hint to add it to my reading list!)
So, the answer for me, for now, is Claude.
Hello Claude - Let's get at it!
No comments:
Post a Comment